The Changing – And Dangerous – World Of Insurance
by John Finger
True story: In early July, a tennis buddy of
mine in Colorado, who we'll call Jim, was
leaving the parking lot of his employer, a large
defense contractor, when a fellow employee, who
we'll call Bumper, backed out of his parking
slot without looking and plowed right into Jim's
car. Bumper immediately realized he was at fault
and apologized. He then said he was late to a
meeting and asked to exchange insurance
information later. Since they were both employed
at the same company, Jim had them exchange badge
numbers, and they agreed to get together the
next day in order to take care of insurance
matters. Bumper thanked Jim and again apologized
for having caused the accident. Jim also spotted
a witness and took down his information.
The next day when the men got together,
Bumper's attitude hardened. Bumper accused Jim
of being at fault for the accident. Jim could
hardly believe his ears. Why had this nice,
apologetic, remorseful fellow employee suddenly
turned into such a jerk?
It's easy: Bumper undoubtedly called
his insurance company and found out that
Colorado had converted from a no-fault state to
a tort state on July 1, 2003. In a tort state,
also known as a fault state, if you are at fault
in an accident, you will pay for your own
damages and injuries. The insurance companies
are there only to protect the innocent parties.
How does this apply in the Jim vs. Bumper case?
If Bumper is at fault, he'll pay for the damage
to his car. If he's injured, he'll pay for the
cost of his medical care. If he's seriously
injured, he'll spend some time in the hospital.
Have you checked hospital and doctor costs
recently? A week-long stay could easily run over
$100,000.00. Who pays it? If you are at fault in
a tort state and are injured, you do.
Of the 1.2 million bankruptcies filed in the
United States in 2001, half were health-related.
The trend continued in 2002, with 1,539,111
non-business bankruptcies filed, and just about
50% of them were also health-related. Don't be
surprised to see figures above 50% in tort
states, many cases of which are filed by people
who didn't know the law or the extent of their
coverage until it was too late.
Of course, many of the health-related
bankruptcies were and are filed by those without
health insurance. But plenty of those are filed
by those who thought their health insurance was
adequate. An accident will quickly acquaint you
with the extent of your coverage. People in tort
states generally enjoy lower auto insurance
premiums. That's all well and good, unless
you're in an accident.
If you are in a no-fault state, the insurance
companies will generally pay the costs involved
beyond your deductible. You pay for such
coverage in the form of higher premiums.
What should you do? First of all, you should
find out if you are in a tort state or a
no-fault state. Call your insurance carrier
to review the law and the extent of your
coverage. If you have a substantial amount of
assets, you'll want at least $1 million worth of
coverage in case you are sued. And you'll want
to talk to your lawyer, since I don't give legal
advice. If you are in a tort state, you'll want
to check with your insurance company and get a
rider on your insurance policy to make sure that
at least your medical expenses are covered even
if you are at fault. The insurance rider will
cost money, but at least you'll have some
protection.
Regardless of which kind of state you're in,
check with your health insurance company
to see if you are somehow covered by that
policy. Even if you're the most careful driver
in the world, you could be involved in an
accident. A friend of mine lost control of her
4-wheel drive WHILE DRIVING WITHIN THE SPEED
LIMIT on an icy road. The vehicle was totaled.
In a tort state, she pays everything! Thank
heavens she wasn't injured. A relative of mine
crashed into her own garage when her kids
distracted her from the back seat, causing a
section of the garage to collapse. Guess who
pays for that in a tort state? So you see, it's
nice to pay lower premiums. It's not so nice
when you realize the consequences.
When You Shouldn't Call Your Insurance
Company: that's not a typo. Example: you notice
a few drops of water forming on your living room
ceiling after a heavy rainstorm. What do you do?
The same as everyone else: you call up your
insurance representative to find out if your
leaky roof is covered. The conversation goes
like this: You: Hi Cindy, this is John Finger.
It looks like we have a leaky roof, due to the
water spot that formed on my ceiling after last
night's big storm. Can you tell me whether it's
covered under my homeowner's policy? Cindy:
Sure, John. Let me look it up on the computer.
[Pause.] Well, your homeowner's policy covers
your roof only in the event of hail damage. I
don't remember any reports of hail during the
storm. Did you get any? You: No, I don't
remember any. Cindy: I'm afraid it's not covered
then, John. Sorry. You'll have to repair or
replace your roof, since normal rain isn't
covered.
But you have an additional problem:
Cindy is probably required to report the inquiry
to her boss. Note that this is just an inquiry,
not a claim. Nonetheless, it is reported. In
many cases, inquiries are treated like mini
claims and are used against you when the
insurance company decides whether to retain you
as a customer. Many times you'll find yourself
paying higher premiums just because you have
inquired about your policy! The bottom line
here: if you have a general question about your
policy, it's okay to call your insurance
company. However, if you are calling regarding a
specific incident, look at your policy first. If
you can't read your policy, get someone who can.
Only call your homeowners insurance company
about a specific incident if you think you have
a valid basis for a claim, and the damage is
more than your deductible. Whenever you are in
an automobile accident that's more than just a
fender-bender, by all means call your insurance
company, even if you're at fault. If it's just a
scratch, and nobody is injured, you may want to
call the company anyway, since the other party
could always turn into a jerk like Bumper and
decide later on that he was injured. Remember,
America is the most litigious society in the
world. The Consequences Of Filing A Claim Let's
go back to the scenario above, where you called
your agent about the leaky roof. She asked you
about hail damage. The thought may have crossed
your mind that it would be a good idea to claim
hail damage, even if you didn't think you had
hail damage. At first, the company will probably
be courteous about it and do all they can to
help. They'll send out an adjuster to look at
the roof and inspect for hail damage. The
adjuster will likely tell you that there's no
evidence of hail damage, and your claim will be
denied. This will go into your file. Your
insurance company may decide to either raise
your rates or decline you altogether, even if
you thought you had a legitimate claim. The
adjuster has to be paid, too, so just think of
your claim as being one of many. When companies
have to send adjusters all over the place, the
policyholders have to pay for it in the form of
higher premiums.
If you decide to fake evidence
in order to make your claim, you would be
joining the $80 billion-per-year insurance fraud
racket. According to USAA Magazine, 10% of all
property insurance claims are fraudulent, and
36% of bodily injury claims are fraudulent.
Included in the fraudulent category are "padded"
claims, whereby the base claim is legitimate,
but the claimant tacks on a few bucks in order
to get a bigger check from the insurance
company.
Most insurance companies have
specialists who work this field. When they
suspect fraud, companies will notify police.
Then the claim you file may be paid somewhat
differently: with handcuffs, free room and
board, and special entertainment from Bubba in
Cellblock C. Even legitimate claims can
compromise your ability to retain coverage.
A
Realtor® friend of mine with multiple properties
was cut off after he filed just two claims in
five years. Yours truly also has experience in
this area: vandalism at one of my houses caused
several thousand dollars in damage. The
insurance company paid the claim and declined to
renew my policy. My replacement coverage cost
nearly three times as much. And here's a tip for
those of you who own multiple properties: claims
are filed by Social Security Number. If you file
a claim for damage at one of your properties,
you can expect your rates to increase
everywhere, that is, if the company doesn't
terminate your coverage. Keep this in mind if
you're thinking about becoming a landlord. If
you rent your home, you may think this
discussion doesn't apply to you. You're sorely
mistaken. Owners must pass on the costs of
owning the property to you, the renter.
Otherwise, they lose money and can't stay in
business. If the owner's insurance rates go up,
so will your rent. Moreover, renters need
renters' insurance, because the owner's policy
generally won't cover the renter's possessions.
Lo and behold, plenty of renters file fraudulent
claims, and this will drive up the cost of your
renter's policy. Nobody can hide from the costs
of insurance fraud. Why are insurance companies
getting more stringent in their coverage and
charging more for the privilege of insuring with
them? A few reasons exist. The biggest one is
9/11. Before that date, insurance policies
generally had no provision for terrorism
coverage. As a result, they got stuck with
billions of dollars in claims. For example,
Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway had to fork
over about $2 billion in 9/11-related claims.
Now policies have a terrorism rider: either you
pay for it, or it's excluded. Another reason is
the trend of natural disasters. We're seeing
more tornados, hurricanes, droughts, fires and
other calamities. A third reason is fraud on
behalf of policyholders. Every person who files
a false or padded claim causes the next person
to pay higher premiums. An insurance company is
a business: if revenues don't support expenses
plus a profit, it's esta la vista for the
insurance company. If there's one silver lining
in all this, it's that people will now think
twice before filing claims or even inquiring
about their policies. An insurance company is
there for you to make legitimate claims and to
answer questions. Don't treat it like a piggy
bank.
So what was the outcome of the Jim vs. Bumper
case: Jim e-mailed me this update just before we
went to press: "I had to give taped testimony to
his insurance company. They tried lots of
different angles and questions to 'snare' me. Eg,
'Where were your eyes while you were driving?' I
replied, 'Straight ahead.' Their comment back
was, 'So you weren't necessarily looking for
traffic entering from the left or right....'
"In the end, their adjuster came out and
looked at the car. It was clear that A) I was
not driving fast (the scrape on the car was only
five feet long) and B) that he backed up
squarely into the middle of my car ie I was
already behind him when he backed up. The
adjuster believed my story at this point and
decided to cover 100% of the costs to repair my
car."
Jim added a conclusion, which is best left as
he sent it to me: "Just because someone works
for the same company doesn't mean they aren't a
jerk. Always get the names and numbers of
witnesses and never assume that the other guy is
going to be honest, cooperate and not lie to
serve his own interests."

John Finger may be contacted at
http://www.moneymanagementfirm.com
moneyman@moneymanagementfirm.com.
John Finger has been in the stock and options
markets for over 20 years. His website includes
a free newsletter, numerous ebooks on financial
topics and a members-only area where subscribers
get his specific stock and option trades, entry
and exit points, profit and loss statements,
market commentary and a real estate corner. You
can check out a sample of what members see at http://www.moneymanagementfirm.com/tradesample.php
Instead of Pouring Rent Money Down the Drain, Why Not Buy the Drain?
Deciding to keep a Budget
Should I Buy a House Now, or Later?
So Much Debt... What Do I Do?
When To Refinance?
|